Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Satte (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 06:10, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Satte (film)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The only source I could find mentions the film a passing mention:. TamilMirchi (talk) 03:12, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep: Hello user, I believe Malaysian Tamil language films article are very notable, as all of them are released nationwide in Malaysia, there are sources, our local media have reportings about these films. It is not like student film, it is REAL theatrical films, no reason for not being notable. I feel terribly sad that you want to nominate the deletion of all these articles, most contributed by me. I believe all these can stay. And, the article is well-written and well-cited, plus with good formatting. I WILL ADD MORE RELIABLE SOURCES. You could just add reference tag. Please reconsider and unnominate the deletion, thank you so much ;) User:LoveFromBJM (User talk:LoveFromBJM 04:25, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I really do not understand your intentions of deleting the articles. You must have known these films is very significant in my countries. Although those cited websites are not news website, they are still media website that reports, making these films notable. Meanwhile, these articles are shorter, BUT you may realized that they are really written properly.

For Satte: I have removed source from Facebook, I have added one more source. Raaga, Varnam, Cinema.com.my are the local media websites that brings reliable information. The Sun is a reliable news site.
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. TamilMirchi (talk) 03:12, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. TamilMirchi (talk) 03:12, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

,, Latest Thank you to Whiteguru for knowing the significance, Please read the latest version, I added 1 more external review site, plus it has The Sun news website which are reliable news website. // Added IMDB title, remove other external links --User:LoveFromBJM (User talk:LoveFromBJM) NEW LATEST: Added 2 Youtube independent Youtube reviews. User:LoveFromBJM
 * Comment The above three comments by User:LoveFromBJM, albeit unsigned.
 * Keep: The external references establish sufficient notability. It is to be noted that WP:FILM sets a very high bar for notability, wanting to have external reviews and secondary sources showing the film has substance and contributes to culture and society and social cohesion, matters like this. There is discussion around this requirement, but we have to work with what we have got, and for now, there is sufficient notablity. --Whiteguru (talk) 11:30, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NFILM Only 1 review cited and no more to be found in a search. Donaldd23 (talk) 19:09, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete- Yes one review is present...but still not enough to establish WP:NFILM. The ongoing discussion regarding sourcing for films is mainly for old movies as reliable reviews for those are hard to come by. For a movie released within the last decade, at the peak of the internet age where multiple platforms, both reliable and not, comment on various matters including movies, demanding for a few reliable reviews to establish notability doesnt look like too high a bar. Sunshine1191 (talk) 11:49, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NFILM; completely agree with Sunshine on this one; if this film were that notable, reviews should exist Spiderone  16:02, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep The article has already have improved formatting and has been expanded enough to be deemed notable. If we are talking about citations and reviews, these films aren't the level of Blockbusters. Instead, we should do tags for further citations rather than delete it as a whole. Thank you. KesunyianAyam (talk) 13:16, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment: YouTube is definitely not a reliable source. Anyone can review a film they like on YouTube! Doesn't help in establishing notability at all. TheRedDomitor (talk) 15:33, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete as per everyone above. Fails WP:NFILM. TheRedDomitor (talk) 10:18, 1 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Weak keep as does have one reliable review. Also YouTube can be a reliable source dependent on the particular channel such as the official channels of newspapers and television stations, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 00:33, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Well in this case it's neither. And what has been listed as two independent Youtube reviews is the same review listed twice with a different title. TheRedDomitor (talk) 02:08, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Well spotted! I definitely don't think they ought to count in this discussion Spiderone  16:32, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
 * They definitely shouldn't be counted, simply based on ethical grounds. Not that fan reviews help in establishing notability anyways. TheRedDomitor (talk) 04:28, 3 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete I only see the one review on a Malay site, so WP:NFILM's threshold of two reviews isn't met. The GSC site doesn't come up for me, and YouTube don't qualify as reliable - it's easier to create a review there than to write this stub. The Sun Daily source is about a supporting actor, with a brief mention calling Satte "a local Tamil film" - but with nothing else about the film. There's no other good coverage that I could find, so no chance of WP:GNG coming into play. TimTempleton (talk)  (cont)  21:50, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak keep was reviewed. Wm335td (talk) 16:23, 7 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.