Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Satu Rautaharju


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. — Edokter  •  Talk  • 15:18, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Satu Rautaharju

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article was tagged for speedy deletion, but the nominator had stripped it him or herself of all assertions of notability. I spent a considerable amount of time yesterday addressing what seemed to be substantial padding, like the assertion that her “professional career began with a co-starring role on Dawson's Creek”, which turned out to be evidently an uncredited, unnamed part as “dancing girl”. While this woman has some small assertions of notability, including a public access t.v. show that I can’t verify through independent sources, her one sourced indie movie role doesn’t seem notable, and I can’t find anything reliable on the other film (the IMDb bio, which is not a reliable source, claims it was an indie short). The work in which she’s currently engaged, as the lead character in ‘’The Adventures of Captain SchoolGirl’’, does not itself seem to meet the notability threshold. It has 21 distinct hits on Google, and according to the Lollipop Magazine piece featured in the article is available through a now dead website and the vanity publisher [www.cafepress.com/fantasytrade Café Press]. WP:BIO sets out as criteria for entertainers (abbreviated) (a) significant roles, (b) large fan base or cult following; (c) unique, prolific or innovative contributions. I don’t see any evidence that this woman yet meets any one of these criteria and believe that until she does this article should be deleted. For those reviewing notability, let me add that the IMDb biography (which is not in any case reliable), like the article in the past, seems to contain some misleading inflation. For instance, “Voted Hottest Canadian” comes down to this, which seems somewhat less significant in context. As a final point, I tagged it yesterday for notability, and it was edited last night, but only to change the dates of some claims in a way that does not meet the sourcing. This original research, like the non-neutral text, makes me wonder if there is a conflict of interest here. Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:53, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete None of the sources provided are reliable ones. This acrtress fails WP:BIO quite clearly. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 12:57, 22 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.