Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saudi Arabia–Turkey proxy conflict


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  09:07, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Saudi Arabia–Turkey proxy conflict

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The article contains many inaccuracies because it contains original research. How many neutral and respected sources describe their relationship as a proxy conflict? In fact, there is no noteworthy proxy conflict between the two countries, and they do not support different militias to extend their influence. Perhaps Libya may be an example, but otherwise there is no conflict between them on any other front. Saudi Arabia does not receive support from the Syrian regime, Armenia, Cyprus, etc. The article in this status deserves to be deleted. Sakiv (talk) 04:23, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2020 November 6.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 04:38, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  09:01, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  09:01, 6 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment On what policy grounds are you proposing deletion? You mention OR, but on a quick glance I haven't seen any, and certainly not enough to warrant killing this. Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:35, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:52, 6 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment I think this article is pretty deceptive and biased. For example, the Kuwaiti boycott of French-made goods is not a sign of supporting Turkey and its policies against Saudi Arabia. everyone knows that both Saudi Arabia and Kuwait enjoy good relations. Also, the editors of this article have used many Turkish pro-AKP sources like state-owned Anadolu Agency and TRT, the Daily Sabah, and the Qatari-sponsored Gulf News. OKMG-1200 (talk) 23:14, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
 * "Saudi Arabia and Turkey enjoy good relations" and "used many pro-AKP sources". Well, your explanation doesn't make any sense at all. If you are saying Turkey before 2010s, then they were in good mod. In here yet you blatantly state Turkey and Saudi Arabia are in "good relations" while the same time you openly criticize pro-AKP information and ignore that Turkey's Erdogan is allying within the interests of Muslim Brotherhood (which Saudi Arabia and UAE opposed) and is openly demonstrating hostility toward Saudi interests. And Erdogan's Turkey has sought control of media since 2010s, which mean, neutral news like TRT and Daily Sabah have become AKP's mouthpieces. Do not talk when you did no research. ZaDoraemonzu (talk) 05:17, 7 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete: all of these "proxy conflict" articles (save for actual, notable, well-written ones, ex. Iran–Israel proxy conflict and Iran–Saudi Arabia proxy conflict) are little more than collections of infobox and timeline gore. Lightspecs (talk) 01:54, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete:Per nom.  Śα ǿt ur α 💬 10:09, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per reasons above. 2001:1970:564B:4700:C434:D3E7:4D55:4838 (talk) 03:25, 13 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.