Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saugor Railway Station


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy Keep. (Non-admin closure) Will move page to Sagar Railway Station per consensus. LAA Fan '' 19:03, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Saugor Railway Station

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

If this railroad is so important, why isn't it longer?  Btilm  23:17, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. The fact that an article is a stub is not in itself reason for deletion. All railway stations are notable, and this one also appears on Wikimapia at http://wikimapia.org/172250/Sagar-Railway-Station -- Eastmain (talk) 00:02, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  —Eastmain (talk) 00:02, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  —Eastmain (talk) 00:02, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep as a "major" railway station. However, this needs to be moved to Sagar railway station. The page creator has a history of creating articles and categories with incorrect names, usually historical names not in use today. I've spent a fair bit of time cleaning up those, and CfDing a good chunk of the categories, missed this in that round of clean up. - Spaceman  Spiff  00:55, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Railway stations are almost always considered notable, and this one is no exception. Though I agree that it needs to be moved to Sagar railway station. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 01:49, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Stations, like schools, and any other geographical feature for that matter, are by definition notable at Wikipedia. The fact that the page creator doesn't conform to Wikipedia style is a matter of clean-up, not AfD.--Technopat (talk) 06:27, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep No valid reason for deletion. BTW I counted 40 trains a day . Agreed it needs moving. Edgepedia (talk) 20:59, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - That an article is short is not a valid reason for deletion. Rlendog (talk) 18:58, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per TheCatalyst31. Thryduulf (talk) 11:08, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.