Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saurabh saklani


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedily deleted after userfying. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] 13:57, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Saurabh saklani
Vanity/Advertisement page. Only claimed notability is publishing a book with only 5 unique Google hits. Or, to use the new term: WP:VSCA Wingsandsword 03:48, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as WP:VSCA and WP:VAIN. --Kinu 03:56, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
 * It just clicked in my head that the author of this page is very likely the subject. Maybe userfy instead? --Kinu 03:56, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, do not userfy. Userfying is pointless when the author only contributes to their own vanity page. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  13:20, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Userfy is what I would have done. Andrew, consider this: person comes along and creates article on themself. Maybe cluelessly, maybe deliberate vanity.  Scenario 1: delete, chomp.  Scenario 2: Move to user space, subst template:nn-userfy and leave a welcome message.  I would say that the trivial effort in doing 2 is justified if as many as 1 in 100 people go on to contribute properly instead of just walking away.  I haven't userfied my 100th yet so I don't know if that is going to happen, I am a notorious idealist.  But anyway, userfy is what I would do here, the user page is redlinked. - Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] [[Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg|25px|  ]] 13:53, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete vanity. The point of a user page is to describe a Wikipedia contributor. Someone who comes here just to write a vanity page wants the page as an article, and would not have written it in a user page no one would ever find. Elfguy 13:54, 8 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.