Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Savage/Noble


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to List of Beast Machines characters. --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 08:19, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Savage/Noble

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Not clear why this character is in any way notable or worthy of encyclopedic coverage. No reliable sources cited. J Milburn (talk) 17:50, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Seems about the same as other transformer articles and there are sources cited, I'm confused what you have against this particular article. Besides, shouldn't you first seek to add whatever content you feel is needed to make the article notable before suggesting deletion? Deletion should be the last resort if a consenses is reached that the article cannot be imporved. Its the Wikipedia way (The Matrix Prime (talk) 18:21, 5 August 2010 (UTC))
 * Yep, there are a lot of Transformer articles with serious issues. Now, do you have any evidence that this subject is worthy of encyclopedic coverage? I am not nominating this article because I feel it is a bad one, I am nominating it because I do not believe it is worthy of coverage. J Milburn (talk) 19:38, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:36, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:36, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:36, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
 * KEEP - This is a fine article. Please stop randomly nominating articles for deletion. Mathewignash (talk) 20:16, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Ridiculous. Are there any reliable sources covering this character? Is there any non-trivial real-world information to convey? J Milburn (talk) 10:58, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge to List of Beast Machines characters until WP:NOTABILITY is established and until the coverage is more than the character list can bear. – sgeureka t•c 07:58, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete or merge: no third-party sources exist to WP:verify notability. Main choice would be to delete but would support merge for the sake of consensus. Shooterwalker (talk) 14:59, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.