Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Savage Messiah (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. BJ Talk 00:10, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Savage Messiah (band)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod - prod tag removed by article's author without explanation. Original prod reason was "lacks coverage in 3rd party sources." I would add that there is no real assertion of notabiliby, except that they have been signed. The only source is their MySpace. Delete. Dawn Bard (talk) 21:19, 29 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete — Unsourced; couldn't find any coverage through Google News. (Ibaranoff24 (talk) 21:27, 29 April 2009 (UTC))
 * Weak keep — Allmusic coverage seems to be sufficient, although the band hasn't charted. (Ibaranoff24 (talk) 03:23, 30 April 2009 (UTC))
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  22:08, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. I assume the Nominator tagged the article for sources and notability, as well as actually going looking for sources themselves before nominating this for AfD. Because they easily pass WP:MUSIC for a rated album review at Allmuic, as well as another here, here and here, and an in-depth interview with the lead singer here.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 23:34, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep: As well as those sources, they've been interviewed in by a German magazine, showing more than just local interest:. Fences and windows (talk) 03:12, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.