Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Savage fold


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:32, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Savage fold

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable bondage position. Bringing to AfD due to age of article. External link in the article is the only "reliable" source I could find. Falls under WP:MADEUP? Redirect as a variation of the shrimp tie? Millbrooky (talk) 20:12, 19 July 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect per nom. I'd suggest this just be closed and the redirect implemented, no need for AfD. Hobit (talk) 22:13, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
 * improve needs more sources. other than that, looking up obscurities is one of the main points of an encyclopaedia, 'notability' be damned (in abscence of any sources, delete). also, 'merge' would be better than 'redirect' anyway --Arkelweis (talk) 18:00, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Can you find a reference other than his website? Anything, even in passing, in an independent RS?  Hobit (talk) 12:33, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:01, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete Insufficient notability. Freakshownerd (talk) 00:58, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete If there are sources, Arkelweis, now would be a great time to reveal what they are. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  03:21, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment No redirect, which would be original research. Savage himself might be notable, but there don't seem to be any sources (other than the linked webpage), much less RS to suggest the position is. Article could possibly have been prodded. Шизомби (Sz) (talk) 04:15, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.