Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Savant Systems


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. – bradv  🍁  15:05, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Savant Systems

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Home automation company does not meet WP:NCORP- coverage consists of generic profile pages and WP:ROUTINE articles about buyouts and acquisitions. MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:52, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:01, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:01, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I wrote this article, and I'm not bothered either way, really. And it's true that the sources are routine articles. Overtone11 (talk) 10:52, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  12:38, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete or redirect to GE Lighting whose purchase is the focus of most available coverage, but purchase and funding coverage falls under trivial coverage at WP:CORPDEPTH. In itself this article fails to demonstrate notability. AllyD (talk) 13:08, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, being the parent company its not a good idea to redirect to its subsidary. Apart from its acquiring GE lights, an appointment of CEO, gets a WSJ dedicated article. The business is subject of several major acquisitions/mergers like, . Furthermore, the acquisition of GE Electric by Servant was subject of massive coverage, altogether pushing it pass WP:NCORP. Chirota (talk) 22:01, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. as the parent company, and as having independent notability.  Notices about acquisitions nad so on don't prove notability as a general course, but if the firms are import enough, they can do so.  DGG ( talk ) 06:54, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Per Chiro725 and DGG.4meter4 (talk) 04:28, 12 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.