Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saving Grace (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 13:33, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Saving Grace (band)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:MUSICBIO. I would have nominated for speedy or PRODed, but the editor who created it would likely object. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:42, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

I could find some more for a bio, if you give me some more time. Metalworker14 (Yo) 10:12, 24 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:13, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:13, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
 * In light of Metalworker14's request, if decision is to not keep, then we should usrify the article. The editor already has another article that is being fixed in the user space though (User:Metalworker14/Twelve Gauge Valentine) and at least one other article that's up for AfD. I have my doubts as to whether we should be bending-over to support this behaviour. Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:40, 25 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep: The band has received significant coverage for their music in reliable sources, Exclaim!, HM Magazine, Cross Rhythms, Jesus Freak Hideout, and Indie Vision Music. I fixed the articles with the aforementioned sources.The Cross Bearer (talk) 02:39, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep: They clearly have more international press than most NZ bands, and if you go by Facebook "likes" they're probably one of the most popular bands in NZ. Could editors please refrain from commenting on other editors in AFD - its not relevent to the discussion. -- haminoon  ( talk ) 09:49, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Sufficient coverage to demonstrate notability. --Michig (talk) 07:38, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Per The Cross Bearer passes WP:GNG has significant coverage.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 12:32, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.