Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saving Mr. Banks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Incubate. Moved to Article Incubator/Saving Mr. Banks Mark Arsten (talk) 00:32, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Saving Mr. Banks

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Article about a movie "tentatively scheduled for a release in 2014, with filming slated to start September 2012" (sic). Seems problematic in terms of WP:CRYSTAL. At the very least WP:TOOSOON. BenTels (talk) 19:56, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Unusually this movie has recieved quite a bit of coverage in the press because of who is in it I suppose, However Delete as WP:TOOSOON Seasider91 (talk) 21:22, 7 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:NFF. However, and in respect to the governing policy toward future events, we definitely have enough sourcability so that this can be mentioned in the various articles of the film's director and major cast, even if not meriting a separate article quite yet.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 00:48, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
 * My only reason to disagree with the deletion is that filming will begin in a month; do movies in production deserve an article? User:patchallel 1842, 7 August 2012
 * Please refer to WP:NFF, the guideline which deals with projects that have not yet begun actually filming, and to WP:NYF, an essay which addesses that pre-filming projects usually do not merit separate articles, although occasional exceptions are allowed if agreed to by consensus... but only when showing far more persistant and in-depth coverage. I will grant that WP:ATD allows incubation for cases where principle filming is imminent, and I am not adverse to it being placed there, out of article space, for collaborative editing and expansion while it awaits its due time.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 05:29, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
 * My apologies and thanks to all for the education on policies; I will follow them more closely in the future. What is the next step? User:patchallel 0646, 8 August 2012
 * We wait out the 7 days (usually). You "might" opine for an Incubation and I would support such action... whatever best serves the project.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 18:42, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I would like to vote for incubation, as filming is "due" in a matter of weeks but will, of course, abide by the decision of the editors. User:patchallel 15:17, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.