Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Savings.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  02:11, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Savings.com

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Promotional article. No evidence of notability under WP:CORP, and WP:BEFORE shows no evidence of WP:CORPDEPTH - sources presented in article are passing mentions of the domain name, lightly-churned press releases in dubious sources about acquisitions of the domain name, and one article actually about savings.com as a product. David Gerard (talk) 23:57, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 23:57, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 23:57, 29 July 2021 (UTC)


 * - Note to closer for soft deletion: While this discussion appears to have no quorum, it is NOT eligible for soft deletion because it has been previously PROD'd (via summary).
 * --Cewbot (talk) 00:03, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –– 𝗙𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗹𝗗𝘂𝗱𝗲  talk  01:02, 6 August 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Assuming this is about a company/organization, then the appropriate guideline is WP:NCORP. I am unable to locate any deep or significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 17:03, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  01:32, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Looks like standard variety promotional page for a business that's not there yet (WP:TOOSOON). Few mentions in niche marketing/business as usual reports, and little else. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 05:32, 16 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.