Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Savvie and Lacey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 12:50, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Savvie and Lacey
You can take a look at this BDSM webcomic here. Out of the 58 links on Google for "Savvie and Lacey", the best assertion of notability came from the front page of Something Awful, as an Awful link of the day. Alexa says 700,000 for those interested. - Hahnch e  n 00:34, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable webcomic. OhNo itsJamie Talk 00:45, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I created the article. I found it through the SA Awful Link and thought it was interesting enough for an article because even though it's about BDSM, it's rather tame.  It may not be notable in WP standards, though, and I won't object to its deletion, but I wanted my intent to be known. Danny Lilithborne 01:16, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as nn. An Alexa rating of 700, 000 and so few google hits are not enough. AdamBiswanger1 02:03, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
 * This has been listed on WikiProject Webcomics/Deletion. Dragonfiend 02:37, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as NN -- Alias Flood 03:12, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Pascal.Tesson 04:26, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:WEB. --Core des at talk. o.o;; 07:36, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Baseball,Baby!   balls  •  strikes  20:36, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I copied this over to Comixpedia last month. It's available at Savvie and Lacey. –Abe Dashiell (t/c) 10:42, 14 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.