Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Savvier


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 17:13, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Savvier

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Spam article for a company that lists no references outside of two company press releases. I told the article's author (who -given his witty username- seems to be an employee of the company in question) a few days back that the article needed some references to secondary sources but none have materialized.  A  Train ''talk 22:48, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Corporate promo. Wouldn't it even qualify for speedy deletion? -- Emana 01:29, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Kinda borderline CSD, but it's probably better that it was brought here. Extremely promotional, little to no encyclopedic content. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 03:05, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete "Direct Response" companies are a dime a dozen.jonathon 23:52, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as cites are to trade publications, not WP:RS. Bearian&#39;sBooties 01:37, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete spam article looks to be the correct assessment. So G11 that ass.   Bur nt sau ce  16:21, 30 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.