Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sawing a woman in half


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy keep, rather dubious nomination, unanimous vote, et cetera. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 03:54, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Sawing a woman in half

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

I don't think the Alliance is going to like this... TonyWonderBread 03:25, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. Um, what? No rationale given. Ten Pound Hammer   o (((Broken clamshells o Otter chirps))) 03:32, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Well-known magic trick, well-sourced. Blueboy96 03:34, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Now that I look at it--well-known magic trick, well-sourced--and the nominator has made no other edits. Speedy keep. Blueboy96 03:42, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. No reason given for deletion. Well-known magic trick, numerous sources, etc. --- RockMFR 03:36, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep, can only assume that this is an objection to the exposure but there's no policy against that. Iain99 03:40, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep This nom is the sole contribution for the nominator.  Acroterion  (talk)  03:42, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.