Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Say the Time


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjo e  04:12, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Say the Time

 * — (View AfD)

Non-notable software, article is spam. It's already been speedy deleted three times, but the creator doesn't want to give up. JDtalk 23:30, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. Its been me who's been putting the db-advert tags on. StoptheDatabaseState 23:32, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. It may be a less-known product, but it's not marketing/spam. WindowBlinds mentions their win and links to their Shareware Industry Awards Foundation People's Choice Awards page. They go farther by linking to Download.com and to a press release in their References. ACDSee makes reference to its shareware status and the pricing of the current version of the product. Spybot - Search & Destroy has no references, only external links -- two of which are two its own web site. Veganguy 23:45, 8 December 2006 (UTC) — Veganguy (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * WEAK WEAK Keep. Had a hard time deciding. The article needs fixing up definitely.  With tweaking I'm thinking it "may" get out of the advert/spam zone... -WarthogDemon 00:18, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep but it's really boarder line. The comment on price and the unsourced parts bother me. ---J.S  (T/C) 00:28, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete; per nomination. --Mhking 01:32, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete; especially in light of the spamer-like activites of User_talk:Veganguy here and at Cute Reminder --Mdwyer 05:34, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Linking to related articles does not constitute spammer-like activities. Veganguy 02:35, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * That's true. I stand by my own impression, but since I can't quite tell you what bothers me about them, I strongly recommend that others investigate on their own and not take my comments as any sort of gospel. I do apologize to you personally -- Wikipedia asks us to assume good faith, and I did not do that. --Mdwyer 21:33, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Thank you -- I appreciate that. :-) This is/was my first Wikipedia article (which, just FYI, I felt inspired to do after reading The Long Tail, so all I'm trying to do is show that it's worthy of keeping. Veganguy 00:16, 13 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Satisfies WP:SOFTWARE. See reviews: Smart Computing Magazine (Vol. 13. Iss. 11, pp 26), PC Magazine (Vol. 23. Iss. 10, pp 131) , and misc. online reviews Veganguy 02:35, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Has 225,000 ghits, mostly on download sites, though. FirefoxMan 16:51, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.