Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saya Mochizuki


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  04:21, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Saya Mochizuki

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I do not think this page should be deleted, but this is the second time this older, established article has been speedy deleted in two days, the first admin who deleted it restored it as notability was found. A substantial article exists on the Japanese Wiki and should be translated to this one. I am putting this to a vote so these false speedies can be stopped. Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 06:32, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy close and take to DRV. Burning Ring of Fire (talk) 07:29, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * It was at DRV, then restored. The speedy-tagger will speedy-tag it again. This AfD vote resolves that problem. Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 07:42, 17 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete as having no indication of notability. Someone can always write an article on the subject in the future if she becomes notable or reference sources indicating her notability can be found. --DAJF (talk) 08:20, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Should easily pass WP:ENTERTAINER: according to Japanese WP, she has starred in at least eight mainstream TV programs, one movie and three "pictorial books" (shashinshu). Jpatokal (talk) 09:23, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Some refs: TVDrama-DB.com (starred in at least 18 serials between 1997 and 2005), IMDB (one movie), Movie.goo.ne.jp (a different movie). WP:ENTERTAINER requires that the actress "has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television, stage performances, or other productions.", what part of this is not fulfilled? Jpatokal (talk) 14:23, 18 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep as per what Jpatokal said. LordAmeth (talk) 11:09, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment How about userfying it until this article makes the same (referenced) assertions as the Japanese article?- Mgm|(talk) 11:32, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete As the article currently stands, the subject fails WP:ENTERTAINER.   Mbinebri   talk &larr; 14:22, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * How the article stands should not be used for evaluating the subject's notability -- ALL information about the subject should be considered. —Quasirandom (talk) 14:36, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I do consider all information - all the information editors deem establishes the subject's notability by inclusion of such info in the article. If there is more, surely it already would have been added after two speedy deletes and existence since 2007.    Mbinebri   talk &larr; 04:55, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Jpatokal. Edward321 (talk) 15:22, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:00, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article on the Japanese wiki is not substantial and has no refs. After spending about 10 minutes trying to find any substantial refs in English and Japanese, I have found none. This article fails every notability guideline. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjoe 04:07, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions.   —Fg2 (talk) 11:25, 18 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.