Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sayali Chandsarkar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Trainwreck.. Creator is a sock. Nominator is a sock. Any editor in good standing is welcome to bring an AfD should they deem it necessary. Star  Mississippi  00:47, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Sayali Chandsarkar

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

last two time (AfD 1 Articles for deletion/Sayali Sanjeev, AfD 2 Articles for deletion/Sayali Sanjeev (2nd nomination)) This time the name has been changed. I don't see how she manages to pass our notability guideline. Near rubbish-sourcing.Probable paid-promo-spam.Nothing resembling non-trivial coverage in RS can be discovered. Cinzia007 (talk) 15:24, 10 March 2022 (UTC) struck confirmed, blocked sockpuppet, Atlantic306 (talk) 11:43, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Cinzia007 (talk) 15:24, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Television,  and India.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:31, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt. The creator of this article was indeffed for socking, and clearly the name was changed to avoid the last two rounds of community consensus in an effort to game WP. I would strongly encourage other !voting editors to consider salting along with their !vote, as this is the third time the article has been created by ban-avoiding editor(s).
 * A note on sourcing for sources 1-6:
 * 1. Zeenews "has been involved in several controversies and has broadcast fabricated news stories on multiple occasions" according to our WP article on it and multiple sources on the page;
 * 2. The TV9 Marathi source is not in-depth and just gives a broad overview of the subject's credits, along with speculation she is dating a sports personality
 * 3. The DNA India source (listed twice) doesn't have a byline and is about the sports personality with one paragraph about Sayali
 * 4. See #4
 * 5. The "Sayali Sanjeev: Movies, Photos, Videos, News, Biography & Birthday | eTimes" on the TimesofIndia website isn't even an article - it's like an IMDB entry
 * 6. The first Loksatta piece is a re-post of six of the subjects Instagram pictures, again without a byline.
 * I can post my assessment about the rest of the sources later (if needed), but they're of similar quality. --Kbabej (talk) 20:52, 10 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep based on number of TV series and films, she would seem to qualify based on guidelines of WP:ENT. Several of the TV series she has been in have Wiki pages, so they would seem to be notable TV series, hence it establishes notability. I don't disagree with source assessment above, but that should not be the only factor. If someone is popular for being in several popular TV shows, they meet the notability Guidelines per WP:ENT. Jupiteralien (talk) 21:45, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm not actually convinced that some of those series are notable. Shubhmangal Online, for example, was also created by an indeffed editor who was socking, then carried on by IPs. It has three sources: the first is actually about the actor, not the show. The second is mostly an interview. The third offers no analysis and is not even four paragraphs long. Perfect Pati doesn't have a WP article. And Kahe Diya Pardes was created by yet another blocked editor. A thorough review of all three of these shows should probably take place as well. --Kbabej (talk) 22:23, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
 * There are 5 films and 2 TV series that have Wiki pages. Only one of them with 3 citations seems that it may not be notable. The rest have plenty of citations. Keep in mind, Indian publications are not like US, so you should not view them as unreliable. They all look crappy. This doesn't mean subject is not notable. The fact is she has been in multiple films and TV series. Jupiteralien (talk) 22:53, 10 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Comment - not only was the article creator a sock, but the nom is also a sock of user:Chatarpatar2020.  Onel 5969  TT me 10:27, 17 March 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.