Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sayyid Ahmed Amiruddin al Jilani al Husayni al Haqqani al Khwajagani an-Naqshbandi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. WjBscribe 04:42, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Sayyid Ahmed Amiruddin al Jilani al Husayni al Haqqani al Khwajagani an-Naqshbandi

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable living person (Previous unsigned comment by Grmagne)
 * Delete/Speedy Delete - I agree with the non-notability, but I go a step further. I ran the names through Google and found no clear/apparent hits for any of the names. I am having a sneaking suspicion that this is acutally a hoax. However, I cannot be bothered to put the leg-work in, since this article does not pass notability in the first place. HagenUK 20:33, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete not a hoax ( hint: drop the patrynomics from the name and search only for the first three words) but is noted in the press as a Canadian Sufi Muslim teacher. Only claim to fame I can find is that he met some alleged terrorists. Fails WP:BIO - Peripitus (Talk) 20:50, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, vanity/spam, not verifiable, possible hoax. Realkyhick 21:02, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - firstly, it's not a hoax. They give these people lots of patronyms. I actually think he's notable enough for inclusion. If we can have office-bearers of the KKK in wikipedia, why not deputies in Turkish Islam? However, please move to Sayyid Ahmed Amiruddin to make the title more manageable. - Richard Cavell 22:55, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I looked for his name in Naqshbandi article and found he's not notable enough to have a separate article. He's deputy of Shaykh Nazim al-Qubrusi and we don't want to write article about every deputy of notable people.-- Sa.vakilian(t-c) 04:06, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable--Sefringle 04:09, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * comment nominator too lazy to put afd template on article, does this mean it should be abandoned & started again? &rArr; bsnowball  11:44, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * it is in now.--Sefringle 17:17, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.