Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ScaleDB


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:30, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

ScaleDB

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No substantial independent secondary sources can be found, fails notability. Created by a single purpose account with edits almost exclusively about ScaleDB. -- intgr [talk] 20:30, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 21:01, 17 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 01:39, 23 January 2013 (UTC)



Reference review. User Go77edit added 3 references to the article, thanks. -- intgr [talk] 09:40, 29 January 2013 (UTC) 
 * 1)  &mdash; paper behind paywall. Not clear if this is independent -- may be ordered/paid for by ScaleDB? Does anyone know?
 * 2)  &mdash; looks like a good source.
 * 3)  &mdash; not a substantial article. The bullet list comes from ScaleDB themselves ("According to ScaleDB, it offers"), so largely not original either.
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 02:21, 30 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Zero independent sources. --Randykitty (talk) 13:08, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.