Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scandale (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:43, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Scandale (film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

I can't find significant coverage for this film. Joe Chill (talk) 01:59, 7 May 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:10, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions.  -- -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 07:41, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 07:42, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect to article on director George Mihalka. The article lacks assertion of notability or sources showing any... and the common name makes searches difficult... but sources are out there... some in French...  So either this gets input perhaps from Canadian Wikipedians with an interest in older 'B' movies, or should get a merge and redirect to the director's article, as he has the notability the current article lacks.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 22:14, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep - This low-budget movie actually attractde quite a lot of coverage in its time (working from memory). Working from Google, we have this entry in Guide to the cinema(s) of Canada.  , , , ,  from the Ottawa Citizen and Montreal Gazette which Google news seems to have a good archive of.  From my own recollection, the Toronto Star also covered the film during its development and subsequent release but they don't appear in any of the searches I executed. -- Whpq (talk) 16:54, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per Whpq... with my thanks.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 01:54, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.