Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scandalous Scavenging Sugar Bombs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy DELETE (as per consensus). -Doc (?) 18:33, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

Scandalous Scavenging Sugar Bombs
Very borderline CSD case in my estimation. If enough vote speedy here it probably should be closed as that. gren グレン 02:38, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Definite speedy. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 01:43, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. --Sensor 03:27, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. *drew 09:39, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy. Neier 11:25, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
 * speedy - why is it borderline? Looks like clear nonsense/test. Rd232 talk 12:16, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
 * I put borderline becaues it seems to make an attempt at saying the group is notable and it seems almost more like immature material than patent nonsense (which would make it CSD) though it is likely both. But, as I said it's very borderline and I doubt anyone would have questioned me if I had put it on CSD. gren グレン 12:23, 22 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.