Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scandinavian Psychologist


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:08, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Scandinavian Psychologist

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article PRODded with reason "New journal, to be launched in the first quarter of 2014. Article creation vastly premature. No independent sources, not indexed anywhere (not surprising, as it doesn't really exist yet). Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals.". DePRODded with stated reason: "The journal is open to submissions, has received attention in Norwegian media and set to become the largest Open-Access journal in psychology in Scandinavia: http://www.nordlys.no/nyheter/article6854869.ece". The link points to a very small item in a newspaper that according to our article has a circulation of less than 30,000. That the "journal is slated to become the largest Open-Access journal in psychology in Scandinavia remains to be seen (see WP:TOOSOON). PROD reason therefore still stands, hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 18:09, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete following WP:TOOSOON. Once launched it may be suitable for an article.-- &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(talk)  02:28, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Hi, there are many references (independent sources) with regard to this journal:
 * http://www.nordlys.no/nyheter/article6854869.ece
 * http://www.dagensmedisin.no/nyheter/nytt-nettsted-for-psykologiformidling/
 * http://bodonu.no/bodo-mann-starter-nytt-nettsted/
 * Therefore this article should not be deleted. It also has its own webpage: www.psykologisk.no All the collaborators of the journal can be seen here: http://psykologisk.no/faglige-medarbeidere/ --Madeleinemahin (talk) 16:21, 29 October 2013 (UTC) — Madeleinemahin (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Comment I have already commented on the Nordlys article above. Dagens Medisin seems to be a more important source, but the article is very brief and arguably more about the persons than the journal. Bodø nu, like Nordlys is a local newspaper with a small circulation; the article is just a few short paragraphs. I find this coverage really too thin to base an article on. Wait a few years until the journal has really become notable and then re-create the article. At this point it is just too soon. --Randykitty (talk) 17:27, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:06, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:06, 30 October 2013 (UTC)


 * delete Too soon. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 04:03, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:49, 31 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:TOOSOON PianoDan (talk) 15:31, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.