Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scanning Systems Australia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jayjg (talk) 04:04, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Scanning Systems Australia

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I cannot find any coverage for this organisation in reliable secondary sources, per the guidelines for notability at WP:CORP. It has been marked as an orphan since October 2008, and at the time of nomination had no inbound links from any namespace (although it is included in a couple of categories). The only significant editing was done in the 10 minutes following creation on 19 December 2007 by user:Ssa-au who returned to add it another category in March 2008. Other than a single surving sandbox edit, user:Ssa-au has no other contributions, which in combination with their username suggests a possible single purpose account with a potential conflict of interest. Thryduulf (talk) 23:40, 17 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 23:40, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 23:40, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. "References" provided are directory listings or not really about this business itself. Not the sort of business that rates an encyclopedia article: The company provides hardware and software solutions to small and medium businesses.... - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:06, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete hardly any third pary in depth coverage. . LibStar (talk) 01:41, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.