Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scare Glow


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to List of Masters of the Universe characters. Another obvious one Black Kite 01:08, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Scare Glow

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

A minor character without any reliable third person sources or notability it should be merged or deleted

Dwanyewest (talk) 21:06, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

I say, keep with sources. Lots42 (talk) 04:17, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not for fan speculation or essays. There were no reliable sources, and as such constituted original research (specifically WP:SYNTH). If sources can be provided to demonstrate that this is notable in any real-world sense then sources should be added.

Dwanyewest (talk) 08:22, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 14:32, 15 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Smerge the part attributable to the He-Man.org interview, assuming that can be tracked down (no link is provided), and delete the original research. Pcap ping  05:53, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep, unless it is merged adequately. It would be better to keep that to lose information  --information that is verifiable,   being based as it should be on the fiction itself.    DGG ( talk ) 05:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Click on Google news search at the top of the AFD. The character was notable enough to be featured in their live action play.   D r e a m Focus  06:10, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Also listed in the almanac for collectible characters(as mentioned in other articles mass nominated at the same time), and elsewhere in Google book search. Sold at Mattel's collector website.  One figure sold for over a thousand dollars according to the article.   D r e a m Focus  06:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC)


 * He-man.org is not a reliable source as it is a fansite WP:FANSITE and its been debated whether its reliable Dwanyewest (talk) 14:25, 19 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Its fails WP:GNG as wikipedia states "Significant coverage" means that sources address the subject directly in detail, and no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention but it need not be the main topic of the source material Dwanyewest (talk) 03:36, 20 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep - Looks pretty good. Better than I thought it could be improved to. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) 07:13, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete no notability independent of the franchise. Ridernyc (talk) 23:39, 22 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete just because something exists doesn't mean it should have an article. There needs to be evidence of notability. 84.9.159.20 (talk) 14:40, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep as sufficiently notable for at worst keeping the edit history per WP:PRESERVE. No legitimate reason exists for not doing that, i.e. no reason for actual deletion here.  Improving or merging and can be discussed on the article's talk page.  Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 16:04, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.