Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scaredy Pants


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to SpongeBob SquarePants (season 1). If there's anything worth merging that hasn't already been done, it can be done from the history. (non-admin closure) Steven Zhang  The clock is ticking....  01:03, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Scaredy Pants

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This article has no sources to establish the notability. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions)  20:09, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 21:04, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 21:04, 10 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Redirect to SpongeBob SquarePants (season 1). Not a notable individual episode. JDDJS (talk) 03:14, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to SpongeBob SquarePants (season 1): The single episode does not meet the general notability guideline. Since the episode name is not in conflict with any other possible subject at present, a redirect should be a good alternative to deletion. Jfgslo (talk) 14:37, 14 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep This epsisode will be followed by Ghoul Fools and I will try to keep this article. Canihuan300 (talk) 20:40, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - No sources, nothing more than someone's WP:OR plot summary and observations about the episode... Sergecross73   msg me   21:48, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to SpongeBob SquarePants (season 1) per Television episodes. That guideline suggests AfD only for episode articles that are OR- this qualifies. It's unsourced original research on an non-notable episode. The guideline on television episodes calls for mergers or redirects in these cases. Since the season's article already has a plot summary, a redirect will suffice.--Slon02 (talk) 23:47, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.