Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scargill Infant School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy deleted per G12 RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:43, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Scargill Infant School

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Infant school. With no references and no indication of its notability, and with none forthcoming (a Google search turns up countless directory listings but no substantive discussion in reliable independent sources), I nominate it for deletion. KDS4444 (talk) 13:40, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Searching found no significant coverage by independent reliable sources. Best found was this blog post.  Fails WP:GNG. Gab4gab (talk) 15:33, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  Rcsprinter123     (warn)  17:22, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  Rcsprinter123     (drawl)  17:22, 4 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete as failing notability guidelines. There's some routine local coverage, as one would expect, but nothing significant. Cordless Larry (talk) 17:57, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * It's also a copyright violation, in the same manner as Whybridge Junior School by the same editor, so I will nominate it for speedy deletion. Cordless Larry (talk) 18:26, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as WP:G12 per . I've left a note on the creator's talk page about WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES and copyvio. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 18:37, 4 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.