Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scarlet and Sookie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 18:47, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Scarlet and Sookie

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Creator of the article contested prod. Plot-only description of a fictional work with no indication of notability. Zakhalesh (talk) 13:56, 2 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete No sources at all. Get rid of this nonsense quickly. It may even be a hoax, or best case kids messin'.  Ohconfucius  ¡digame! 14:29, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy is fine by me but it should match some criterion first and they're awfully strict on fiction. Zakhalesh (talk) 14:30, 2 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. No indication of where this story has been published, and Googling turns up nothing relevant. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 17:34, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as I can't think of a criterion of CSD that fits, except hoax. I'm rejecting that as it looks like a quite valid plotline for a young adult series - either novels or comic - that's being created. Whether it would be publishable or not is not the issue here. The thing that concerns us right now is that it hasn't been. Peridon (talk) 18:14, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:28, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, hoaxes have to be blatant. Zakhalesh (talk) 07:51, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.