Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scarlett McAlister


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Buck  ets  ofg 21:34, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Scarlett McAlister

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Seemingly non-notable actress, sounds like it was written by a publicity firm. GhostPirate 17:04, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - only link is to her own website, so no evidence of multiple non-trivial coverage in independent sources to meet WP:BIO. Delete unless sources are added to establish notability. Wal  ton  Vivat Regina!  17:23, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Nice picture (Speedy delete) I was looking for some roles in films/plays I recognised - there were none. As a what clearly appears to be a "professional" article, it really is up to the writer to justify that the article is kept which it doesn't do! Mike 17:31, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete article under WP:BLP failing WP:ATT Alf Photoman  18:47, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: Non-notable and it seems more of a self-advertisement for her web-site than anything else.  Seicer  (talk) (contribs) 19:42, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Neutral. She has more acting credits than the usual I've seen for actors at AfD or prod (see IMDb), but they are mostly in supporting roles.  -- [[User:Black Falcon|Black Falcon] 19:57, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. I was going to bring up her IMDB page myself. It shows her finding work pretty steadily, but in minor roles. Her strongest claim would probably be the four episodes of Wildfire. She also seems to have a reasonably prominent role in the still-unreleased Fissure, but based on the cast it doesn't seem like a major production. Still, she does have a longer list of credits and more Ghits than the typical "up and coming" starlet, and if she can keep up this pace for a few more years, she could qualify through quantity even without a major role. -- Groggy Dice T | C 23:29, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak delete she looks really nice, but no evidence of notability and no refs. I'd probably change my vote if someone refed it properly. NBeale 21:37, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:BIO. --MaNeMeBasat 11:23, 10 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.