Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sceabhar na dheasa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Deleted per WP:SNOW and WP:HOAX - Smerdis of Tlön 05:26, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

Sceabhar na dheasa
Looks suspiciously like a hoax to me, and there's nothing on google which indicates verifiability there. Anyone with the Gael who can translate the title, at least, to give some indication of what we're dealing with? Grutness...wha?  00:34, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - obvious hoax. ŞρІϊţ ۞ ĨήƒϊήίтҰ (тąιк 00:44, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: This sure looks like a hoax. Unless someone can show that it isn't, it should be deleted. Heimstern Läufer 02:45, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. MER-C 03:38, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Definite hoax. Sr13 06:53, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Hoax, and I'm hedging a bet on nonsense.  --Dennisthe2 06:55, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I've tried http://www.englishirishdictionary.com/ and I just can't get the phrase to translate at all. There also seems to be a lack of accents and such on the various words which suggest it could be made up or less than notable. If it makes sense to the good folks over at Gaelic Wikipedia then they can have it. -- Kind Regards -  Heligoland  |   Talk  |   Contribs  10:48, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, likely hoax. It wouldn't really be notable enough even if it was genuine. Bob talk 13:15, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, likely hoax. The spelling seems modern, or at least modernized; the bh and dh conventions are from Modern Irish, and relate to the adoption of the modern Latin alphabet as opposed to the Irish alphabet. - Smerdis of Tlön 15:20, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, either hoax or so obscure its not mentioned anywhere, tried some standard works (books) and drew a blank Alf photoman 15:58, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as nonsense and non-notable - so tagged. Moreschi Deletion! 16:00, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as hoax. 7 ghits, all from Wikipedia or mirrors.  Hut   8.5   18:57, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete for being a patent nonsense hoax with no verifiability whatsoever.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 19:05, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per CSD G1 - Nonsense. JRHorse 19:25, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - g1. Baka man  19:40, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletions.   --Slgr @ ndson (page - messages - contribs) 19:52, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as hoaxy nonsense.-- danntm T C 20:03, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, hoaxaliscious. SkierRMH, 21:18, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - for what it's worth, I've already tried a G1 speedy on the article. It was rejected.  It might go per WP:SNOW, but it seems that they who do the speedy deletes don't want this one.  --Dennisthe2 22:02, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as hoax. Google doesn't even recognize "Ian Pender" of Connemara as existing outside this article. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 23:40, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom as hoax. Big  top  23:51, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete has the aroma of a hoax.--John Lake 00:45, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete close
 * Delete, especially as no one has voiced an opinion to the contrary. Charlie 22:43, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - even if it were real it would not be notable.Glendoremus 03:59, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Zetawoof.Akanksha 17:55, 24 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.