Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scent Organs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. No consensus over whether it should be redirected slakr  \ talk / 22:56, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Scent Organs

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Page does not meet criteria for notability. In particular there are no references suggesting the band recorded or released any music, very little background information at all, and no sources. The information that a member of a notable band had previously been in a non-notable band would usually only be a detail in the text of the notable band's page, in this case Duran Duran. Soulstaticsound (talk) 16:02, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2014 February 21.  — cyberbot I  Notify Online 16:18, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:19, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:20, 23 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Roger Taylor (Duran Duran drummer) as a plausible search term. Coverage may exist in Melody Maker back issues which I don't have access to, but what coverage I'm seeing online consists only of brief mentions and in relation to Taylor.  Gong   show  18:25, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not worth a redirect. Szzuk (talk) 20:45, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect per . Until something more notable needs that particular bit of the main namespace, doesn't seem like a big deal to redirect. 0x0077BE  [talk/contrib] 05:39, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nearly 5 years after being tagged, still no sources. Redirect doesn't seem necessary for something so non-notable. mikeman67 (talk) 01:38, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.