Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Schädling


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect, as is standard for non-notable albums. The history will be intact in the redirect (not deleting anything) if anyone wants to mine it to expand the artists' article. Keeper &#448;  76  17:34, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Schädling

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Album with little claim in article of meeting WP:MUSIC. No professional reviews found at metacritic or allmusic; album has not charted per allmusic. Professional review linked in article has a non-professional air to it (no name on review and grammatical errors suggest it was not professionally edited), but I'm not certain so I'm bringing to AfD for discussion. Fabrictramp |  talk to me  15:18, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 *  Weak support Delete although those two websites may not have information, a gsearch does give 1mil+ for the band, and considering this band has a fairly extensive discography, I think this article passes the wp:music for albums. But the article does need some work to be sure. Boccobrock • T  04:59, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
 * After thinking about it a bit more, I think the part that requires independent coverage is very likely to not be fulfilled in this case. Thanks fabrictramp for the reminder, Boccobrock • T  18:05, 22 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  15:18, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:06, 22 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Oppose, on the rationale that if the artist is notable, then that artist's albums are also notable. -- Aseld  talk  05:57, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment by nom: I hope everyone will take a minute to read MUSIC, which says "In general, if the musician or ensemble that recorded an album is considered notable, then officially released albums may have sufficient notability to have individual articles on Wikipedia." Please note this says may have sufficient notability, not does have sufficient notability. WP:MUSIC also says "All articles on albums, singles or songs must meet the basic criteria at the notability guidelines, with significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." I hope the keep !voters will add those sources to the article. Thanks!-- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  14:22, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, doesn't meet WP:NMG. Notability isn't inherited. If deleted, redirect to wumpscut:. Stifle (talk) 07:30, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect to wumpscut:. Notability not established but is a valid redirect. Davewild (talk) 08:30, 27 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.