Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Schannel (YouTube channel)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 01:00, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Schannel (YouTube channel)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG Not to be confused with the Microsoft product. Kleuske (talk) 13:21, 14 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - Besides being yet another of those damned infobox only articles from an obvious COI account (which is enough for me personally to want to delete it, burn the remains, and spread the ashes), the only possible thing that could be a credible claim to significance is maybe having 0.5 million subscribers (just maybe squeaking by db-web), but that doesn't put it in the same solar system as even the top 50. Even worse, the title is so exceedingly generic that the onus is completely on the author to provide something to save it from deletion. Since this is one of those article made to avoid A3, and "fuck it you fix it for me", I see no reason to think that's gonna happen. Delete with a vengeance. Timothy Joseph Wood  20:11, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - I have been saying that there should be an A12 criterion for infobox-only articles, which never have a valid purpose, and are always used to avoid some rule. However, since we can't speedy this thing, just delete it.  Robert McClenon (talk) 20:33, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Full disclosure though, I notified RMc of the existence of the article due to his involvement with multiple similar discussions at WT:CSD. If that's a form of canvassing then maybe our !votes should be somewhat pro-rated. Timothy Joseph Wood  20:43, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:24, 14 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Fails WP:GNG. Really don't like to see these infobox only articles., that's not canvassing. SW3 5DL (talk) 03:47, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Meh. I could have wagered my life savings on the way his opinion would have swung. So it's not exactly contacting an impartial third party either. Timothy Joseph Wood  12:00, 20 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - non-notable youtube channel. CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   19:22, 21 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.