Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Schatzi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. v/r - TP 20:14, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Schatzi

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable band. Speedy declined. No indications that the band meets any of the criteria of WP:BAND. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:53, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 15:57, 22 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Insert in paper shredder. This is not considered notable, not even by a longshot. Also, a Facebook link? Really? There is no way this meets Notability. James1011R (talk, contribs - Visit The Forge) - That's ridiculous. It's not even funny. 21:36, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
 *  Weak k Keep. It's evident that the creator of this article doesn't yet have a good grasp of how to prove notability on Wikipedia, but some gNews searches reveal that this band did receive at least a modicum of press and critical attention, and they did have an album released on Mammoth Records.   For example, here's a couple of notices from CMJ New Music Monthly, a short item in Billboard , and a warm review in The Post and Courier.  Looks like there may be more out there behind pay walls.  Here's their AllMusic page for further info. --Arxiloxos (talk) 03:29, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
 * note: added link to short Billboard article--Arxiloxos (talk) 13:49, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Moved !vote to keep, see comments below.--Arxiloxos (talk) 16:19, 30 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - TP 01:05, 30 September 2011 (UTC)




 * Speedy delete per G7 -- no statement to assert notability. Google searches revealed no reliable sources explicitedly about the subject in question (fails WP:GNG). Google News searches revealed nothing about the band. Sp33dyphil "Ad astra" 06:56, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Did you read the sources I cited above (some found via Google Books)?--Arxiloxos (talk) 13:34, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment. I've now edited the article to include information and sources from CMJ New Music Monthly and Report, Billboard, The Austin Chronicle, and The Post and Courier.  In addition, GNews indicates that, behind pay walls, there's reviews or coverage of this band in The New York Post, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Salt Lake Tribune,  The Sun News, and Austin American-Statesman.  This coverage is sufficient to pass WP:GNG and WP:BAND #1.  The band had two releases on Mammoth Records and so appears to pass WP:BAND #5 as well. --Arxiloxos (talk) 16:19, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.