Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Schedule of reinforcement

This topic is covered more extensively in Reinforcement, which is where it can most efficiently and appropriately be discussed. I don't see the point of having a separate article about schedules of reinforcement unless the Reinforcement article becomes too big. The few links to this stub could easily be changed. John FitzGerald 14:25, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Agreed, there's no need to repeat something which is already explained.--Janarius 14:35, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

I have now redirected it. I apologize for the confusion. I carefully followed the instructions for listing the article for deletion, but it didn't show up in the list. Although apparently it does when other people look at it. Anyway, I decided the issues were so obvious that a redirect was more suitable. I also replaced the one link to the artivcle. If someone wants to convert it into a highly detailed article about schedules of reinforcement then I'd be quite happy if they undid the redirect. And again I apologize for messing this up. John FitzGerald