Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scheduling of Emmerdale


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Emmerdale. Tone 13:32, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

Scheduling of Emmerdale
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Wikipedia is not a WP:TVGUIDE. Aligns with WP:FANCRUFT and WP:OR. DarkGlow (talk) 01:00, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 01:48, 27 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Emmerdale and remove the hatnote on main article. I agree this does fall into the category of articles which probably should not be on wikipedia, and as there is already a section, then it should be redirected. Bungle (talk • contribs) 12:46, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge The information in this article detailing the scheduling variants, especially prior to 1988, should be kept and a shortened version of what is detailed in this article can easily be added to the Emmerdale section of the main Emmerdale article. Similarly, the Emmerdale section can be included in the main article as a new section, or as a subsection of Emmerdale. Therefore, as long as the important information is retained, I see no reason for a separate article, especially as it can be argued that the article is not far short of being a WP:TVGUIDE. Rillington (talk) 16:03, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge to main article whatever is needed. --Gonnym (talk) 11:10, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge and cut down for Emmerdale. Toughpigs (talk) 18:27, 30 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.