Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Schedulix


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 13:26, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Schedulix

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I can't find enough sources to pass WP:NCORP (significant coverage, independent and reliable sources). MarioGom (talk) 13:19, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. MarioGom (talk) 13:19, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. MarioGom (talk) 13:19, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. MarioGom (talk) 13:19, 4 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi MarioGom, as job scheduler software is not such a "hot" topic for most magazines, for that reason there are so not many articles about the open source solution schedulix. But there is a user community, you find on schedulix.org. There are many admins worldwide who automate their maintenance tasks with schedulix or use schedulix for other automations. Another problem is that most job schedulers are backed by large corporations that can invest a lot of money in advertising and are therefore more visible. Augusta05 (talk) 11:01, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
 * While I appreciate all open source projects, that has little to do with our General notability guideline or our notability criteria for products. MarioGom (talk) 16:25, 7 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete - lacks sourcing required to pass WP:NCORP, WP:NSOFTWARE or WP:GNG. - MrOllie (talk) 12:35, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Although there are a handful of sources, they only offer a brief overview, and seem like fairly ROUTINE coverage of new software releases, which one would expect from IT magazines. The Admin-Magazine and Linux Magazine articles also appear to be identical, except Linux Magazine is in German, so there's even less unique coverage. Sunmist (talk) 14:32, 7 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.