Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scheller College of Business


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against individual nominations for each topic. The merge suggestion later in the discussion can be discussed on various article talk pages, if desired. North America1000 10:04, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

Scheller College of Business

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Cited sources do not indicate notability (which is not inherited from its indisputably notable parent organization) ElKevbo (talk) 05:45, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason:
 * Georgia Institute of Technology College of Sciences
 * Georgia Institute of Technology College of Engineering
 * Georgia Institute of Technology College of Design
 * Georgia Institute of Technology College of Computing
 * Ivan Allen College of Liberal Arts
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Education, Schools, Technology,  and Georgia (U.S. state).  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:11, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete we do not have the depth of sourcing to justify seperate articles on these sub-units of a university.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:57, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Procedural keep It's possible that some may not be notable, but these need to be analyzed individually. Additionally, I would be surprised if the school of engineering at what is considered to be one of the best universities in the world in that field is not notable. Best, GPL93 (talk) 18:42, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
 * It's pretty unusual for individual colleges at U.S. universities to be independently notable; the onus is on those who claim that they are to substantiate that claim. ElKevbo (talk) 22:48, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:30, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete from what I can tell all of these are referenced to extremely trivial and (or) primary sources. I couldn't find any in-depth secondary coverage about them when I looked either. In the meantime it's perfectly fine to mention whatever minor bit of these might be notable in Georgia Institute of Technology. So there's really no valid justification to keep the articles. Especially considering these aren't even mentioned in the parent article at this point. If they aren't notable enough to be included in the main article then there's no way they are notable enough for separate articles. --Adamant1 (talk) 02:29, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. ElKevbo (talk) 02:31, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep:  Here's the top 30 U.S. business schools in the United States according to the current U.S. News rankings: Stanford Graduate School of Business, Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, University of Chicago Booth School of Business, Kellogg School of Management, Harvard Business School, MIT Sloan School of Management, Columbia Business School, Haas School of Business, Yale School of Management, Tuck School of Business, New York University Stern School of Business, Fuqua School of Business, Ross School of Business, University of Virginia Darden School of Business, Samuel Curtis Johnson Graduate School of Management, Tepper School of Business, USC Marshall School of Business, UCLA Anderson School of Management, McCombs School of Business, UNC Kenan–Flagler Business School, McDonough School of Business, Foster School of Business, Kelley School of Business, Owen Graduate School of Management, Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of Business, Goizueta Business School, Warrington College of Business, Scheller College of Business, Carlson School of Management, W. P. Carey School of Business.  There's a reason every one of these is a blue link.  These are prestigious American business schools.  A nomination that says "cited sources do not indicate notability" simply doesn't reflect that WP:BEFORE has been followed and isn't valid for an institution like this.  We have and will always have hundreds of thousands of poor articles on notable subjects. On this basis I also !vote Procedural Keep on all.--Milowent • hasspoken  18:19, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I've added a few sources as well, we could add tons more if we took the time.--Milowent • hasspoken 18:59, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks. If you can find substantive and independent sources about these schools - not specific programs at the school, not people who at one time worked at the school, and not the university of which the school is a constituent member - then please add them to the articles! ElKevbo (talk) 03:09, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Of course I could, but writing so much about American business schools might crush my soul.--Milowent • hasspoken 13:19, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   13:41, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per Milowent. --Vaco98 (talk) 03:20, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Merge the pages Georgia Institute of Technology College of Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology College of Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology College of Design, Georgia Institute of Technology College of Computing and Ivan Allen College of Liberal Arts into a new page with a name like Colleges of the Georgia Institute of Technology. This has a number of advantages: (a) the colleges combined have a higher level of notability, (b) it gives a nice target for redirects, and (c) it provides somewhere for citations and information to marinate before being split off to individual pages at a later date once information warrants it. Gusfriend (talk) 02:13, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.