Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scheneckentaenze


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 00:51, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Scheneckentaenze

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I can't find significant coverage for this bootleg. Joe Chill (talk) 00:46, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  — J04n(talk page) 11:14, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I can not find significant coverage for this bootleg; does not meet WP:NALBUMS.  Gongshow  Talk 01:34, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Does not meet WP:NALBUMS nor WP:GNG; the most extensive statement I could concerning the album was "Yet another bootleg. Sound quality is poor but it's a good show" and that was from a fan site. J04n(talk page) 02:30, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Agree with arguments about notability above. Note that an unofficial bootleg album can achieve notability if there is robust third-party discussion about it (for example, see the category Led Zeppelin bootleg recordings), but little or no public knowledge of this one is apparent. Doomsdayer520 (Talk|Contribs) 09:57, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as fancruft - "live concert bootleg LP. The exact date/venue is unknown at this time." Bearian (talk) 23:01, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.