Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Schiel & Denver Publishing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 04:13, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Schiel &amp; Denver Publishing

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod. Created as an advertisement by User:Schieldenver, company has no products released yet. (WP:FUTURE) JRP (talk) 23:39, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: User:Schieldenver has been banned since contesting the prod. Speedy Delete may be warranted, but I am unsure of the process in this case. JRP (talk) 23:45, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete A7 (corporations). So tagged. Speedy tagging can be done at any time if an article qualifies, unless its history shows at least one revision that does not. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 01:57, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * not speedy I think it would be cleaner if it were deleted this way after the discussion, so I removed the tag; it does in my opinion not really fit a7. I note the user was banned only for having a promotional user name, not for misbehavior. I deplore the practice of doing this without warning, and while an afd on the article is pending, and then trying to speedy the article as well. Reminds me of rushing a suspect to execution. The normal process will work well enough. DGG (talk) 05:20, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * (Weak) delete i originally prodded the article as i identified the company as being a really new one with no actual releases yet. However i agree with DGG that this is not a speedy, as its not blatantly non notable. Thats why we got prod/afd Excirial ( Talk, Contribs ) 07:56, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete: blatant advertising. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 12:19, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * removed this one too. Let the afd decide. What is this rush to cut off discussion? The very person who placed the prod wants to continue the afd, just above. DGG (talk) 14:28, 1 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Should have been speedied. Blatant advertising and nothing but blatant advertising. Themfromspace (talk) 21:25, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep & Stubify - The amount of info currently available does provide Verifibility. WP is not paper and can afford to keep as a Stub. As it is "late 2008", it should soon start active publication. "Blatant advertising", no, a G11 does not fit. Exit2DOS2000  •T•C•  01:06, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The problem is that it hasn't achieved enough notability for inclusion yet. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 02:55, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * the time to start the article is when they actually publish and have some books that attract attention, even if not notable enough for articles at first. Then there will be something to talk about, and some sources. DGG (talk) 02:37, 5 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.