Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Schismatic Catholic Church


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE.  Rob e  rt  02:00, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

Schismatic Catholic Church
Delete Unless it is verified. Dudtz 9/29/05 5:37 PM EST Keep. This Church is the only TRUE CHURCH. Huhedda Falzon, Secretary to HH Pope Leo XIV
 * del. Unverifiable. Google minus wikipedia gives almsot no hits. mikka (t) 16:25, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. This schismatic body exists. Google is not the arbiter of verifiability. --Nicodemus75 17:03, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Google is an arbiter. Provide another one plz.mikka (t) 17:07, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, hoax. If this were true, it would certainly be reported in the media - and thus show up on Google (it doen't bacause it's not). Plus, I doubt any church would call themselves 'schismatic' - that's a pejorative lable. Nicodemus, you have five days to verify this - and if you can, I'll be the fist to apologise. --Doc (?) 17:23, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - This seems to be yet another story that exists only wikipedia and it's mirrors.   --rob 20:57, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Sounds unlikely. The fife or so google-hits do not help (wikipedia-related with the difference that they add this malta-story). In de:Malta 400.000 people are living, 98% roman-catholic. 17.000 "schismatic catholics" will be nearly 5% of the population. Most probably a hoax. -- Andy.we 23:45, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Apparently an article about the "pope" of this church, Raymond Dimech, was the subject of another VfD and was deleted.  See Votes for deletion/Raymond Dimech.  I can't verify that this church exists or is led by this "pope". --Metropolitan90 00:49, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
 * I get the impression this isn't the first or last case like this. Antipope lists a number of modern nobodies who claim to be pope, with red and blue links.  Apparently, anybody can say their the pope, get mentioned somewhere (or nowhere in this case), and get an article in wikipedia, which is not a good thing.  --rob 01:59, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete unless verified. --Angr/undefined 06:43, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.