Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Schmooze Com Inc


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to FreePBX Distro.  MBisanz  talk 01:03, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Schmooze Com Inc

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails wp:gng and fails wp:corp. Previous G11 tag denied and no non-PR refs forthcoming. UnbelievableError (talk) 07:04, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:29, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:29, 27 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Possible delete - Despite performing multiple detailed Google News searches including "FreePBX", "PBX", "Tony Lewis", "Wisconsin", "communications company", etc., I haven't found anything useful aside from additional news.tmcnet.com links here and here, both from 2008. If additional sources can't be found then I think there isn't much notability for this article. SwisterTwister   talk  21:53, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 18:51, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran  ( t  •  c ) 10:21, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

 Merge into FreePBX Distro. I think that's the only thing the company actually does, and the distro is probably notable. One article is justified for the two of them, and we have no firm policy about which one it should be. I suspect the name of the distro is the more recognizable, in which case that's the title of the final article. If I'm wrong, the merge should be the other way round.  DGG ( talk ) 04:25, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.