Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Schnorbitz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was merge and redirect to Mike & Bernie Winters. - ulayiti (talk)  17:21, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Schnorbitz
Non-notable dog, followed by nice story about an unrelated even less notable dog. If article about owner created some day can be mentioned there. Weregerbil 08:08, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable dog owned by someone who doesn't have a wikipedia article so can't even merge. MLA 10:41, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete non-notable animal. S iva1979 Talk to me  11:59, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Schnorbitz was a very familiar canine face on British TV from the 1960s to the 1980s, although I suppose it would make more sense to have a decent Bernie Winters article before even considering keeping his dog. Keresaspa 12:38, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep as notable animal, although I would also support a merge into existing Mike & Bernie Winters article. — sjorford (talk)  13:16, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Mike & Bernie Winters mentions the dog. The only additional information Schnorbitz now has is that there was an unrelated dog by the same name. If Schnorbitz is a well known name maybe redirect the dog to the duo? Now that some kind soul redirected Bernie Winters to M&BW the whole thing is coming together. Weregerbil 13:28, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge the Harry Hill sentence to Harry Hill, and redirect to Mike & Bernie Winters -- Astrokey44 |talk 15:08, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect as per Astrokey44. -- Mithent 18:48, 15 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.