Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/School for Children, Eatontown, New Jersey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep  per WP:SK. Nomination withdrawn with no outstanding delete !votes. (Non-administrator closure.) NorthAmerica1000 01:38, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

School for Children, Eatontown, New Jersey

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Lacks notability Muffinator (talk) 00:39, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 01:08, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:27, 26 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - I agree with Muffinator that the original article did not indicate notability as well as lacked valid references. I believe that I have rectified the article and that it is now acceptable.  I am not associated with the subject in any manner.--Rpclod (talk) 23:40, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - This article once had significanlty more content  but  by  stages it  has been reduced to  a tiny  stub. I'm sure that  it  could be expanded again. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:01, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
 * As the nominator, I've changed my opinion to keep. The article was simply lacking appropriate citation, and now that some have been added, its notability is more clear. Muffinator (talk) 23:08, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment - please note that the article was moved to Hawkswood School after this discussion started. This is NOT a discussion about deleting the redirect. Muffinator (talk) 23:09, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment Now who was bold enough to do that? What is the motive for re-directing an article undergoing a deletion discussion?     ArcAngel    (talk) ) 00:15, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The editor who moved the page is Rpclod, and the reason is that the school's name has changed. Seems like a good reason to me, although they probably should have at least mentioned the name change here as part of the justification for notability. Muffinator (talk) 01:19, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Given that, I don't think that editor realized that you shouldn't "move" pages while they are in a deletion discussion, unless I am wrong about that.    ArcAngel    (talk) ) 01:46, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  22:34, 1 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Per WP:AFDEQ: "While there is no prohibition against moving an article while an AfD discussion is in progress, editors considering doing so should realize such a move can confuse the discussion greatly, can preempt a closing decision, can make the discussion difficult to track, and can lead to inconsistencies when using semi-automated closing scripts." You are correct that moving during AFD is discouraged, however it is not prohibited. Given that the title is incorrect, I felt that the value of naming correctly outweighed the potential impact on the AfD process.  On the other hand, I should have clearly noted that move in this discussion,  appreciate Muffinator's catch, and apologize for any confusion that my change or omission caused.--Rpclod (talk) 22:00, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.