Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/School of Management, RK University


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Secret account 05:05, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

School of Management, RK University

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable department of an Indian university. Article is almost purely promotional with no content worth saving. Luke no 94 (talk) 21:43, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

I thought that schools were considered automatically notable. Is this only publicly operated schools? &mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 22:08, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * It's not a school, despite the name. It's the department of a University. Therefore, to the best of my knowledge, it doesn't qualify as being automatically notable. Luke no 94  (talk) 22:11, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * So this guideline applies and the question is whether this particular department has attained special notability. AllyD (talk) 22:30, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Cameron11598  (Converse) 22:22, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * That's the badger. It would help if I'd linked to that in the nom, ah well. I can't see anywhere near enough coverage in order to satisfy WP:ORG - hence the nom. Luke no 94  (talk) 22:36, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi all. I believe you have a problem with the use of language in the article here. Sisnce I am new to the wikipedia can you please suggest some modifications to change the ton of the article here?
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, most of the article would need an extensive rewrite for it to be non-promotional. The first section is fine, however, much of the rest of it is either too promotional, or completely irrelvant (BBA + MBA Integrated Program seems irrelevant to me, and the Placement Records definitely are, especially when unsourced). The major problem is that, for a University department to be notable, it must have significant coverage in reliable sources, and I'm afraid that I strongly doubt this is the case here - but feel free to prove me wrong! If I believed the subject was notable, I'd have fixed the language myself. Luke no 94  (talk) 08:02, 14 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Theopolisme   ( talk )  00:08, 20 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete, department of RK University. Doesn't seem to be a useful redirect title. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  16:07, 20 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete I was going tosuggest merging it into RK University but there really is nothing worth merging. J04n(talk page) 01:26, 28 March 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.