Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/School of Resentment


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 02:16, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

School of Resentment
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This article contains no references, footnotes or citations, in fact nothing at all to suggest that the subject even exists, let alone that it is notable. RolandR 12:54, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep The article is in desperate need of fixing, but the term is notable, based on the numerous secondary sources that describe the term. And remember, AfD is about notability, not the article status at the moment. Angryapathy (talk) 14:30, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep per Google Books and Google Scholar references. &mdash; goethean &#2384; 14:45, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - certainly needs refs and linkage into Bloom and his work, but current state is one for improvement not deletion. AllyD (talk) 21:06, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
 * keep please this is a article that needs some improvement yes but not erasing yuckfoo (talk) 01:01, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.