Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Schoolbags for Kids


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Steven Zhang  The clock is ticking....  01:41, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Schoolbags for Kids

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Speedy A7 was successfully contested by the addition of references which, at first glance, sound like they come from reputable news outlets, except that they are merely press releases published as is by said outlets. Google News doesn't point to anything more promising. Delete.  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 21:45, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - most of the independent coverage is in blogs, so far, but they appear to be notable blogs like DailyCandy and Inhabitots/Inhabitat.-- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 22:11, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - also Parade Magazine.--User talk:Makeitbetter3009
 * Keep. All the sources look reliable to me... Bobnorwal (talk) 23:02, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. More than enough 3rd-party, reputable sources to merit inclusion of this company. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.169.78.194 (talk) 15:46, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Struck above !vote, passes WP:DUCK test for dup vote from Makeitbetter3009.-- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:52, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 20:13, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.