Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Schostal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn by nominator. Kurykh (talk) 05:34, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Schostal

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't meet WP:NOTABILITY. Photos bought by museums, but were they exhibited? Boleyn (talk) 08:51, 5 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep. The article looks like a stub, but this is a historical photo agency labeled by Europeana as "one of the most recognized photograph agencies of the inter-war period, with branches in Vienna, Paris, Milan and Berlin." . According to the German Historical Museum, "Schostal was one of the largest agencies of the 1920s and 1930s", as described in their book “People, places, times: Photography at the German Historical Museum” as well as in their exhibition about the 20th century . Clearly notable. Citing and more in-depth info would benefit the article, but AfD is not the place to work that out. -- IsaacSt (talk) 20:33, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Withdraw nomination per above. Thanks,. Boleyn (talk) 20:39, 5 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.