Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Schrödinger's cat


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. Unproductive and not funny. Please use userspace rather than actual encyclopedia processes for attempts at humor. See WP:AN.  Sandstein  17:56, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Schrödinger's cat

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Until we examine the article directly after this discussion, this article is conceivably simultaneously notable and not notable. Further study and consensus is required. :) -- Dennis The Tiger  (Rawr and stuff) 01:32, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep First Ten Pound Hammer's cat and now this... ;) Bulldog73 talk da contribs  go rando 01:38, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * $$\Delta keep\, \Delta delete \ge \frac{\hbar}{2}$$ per WP:HEISENBERG. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 02:25, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Uncertain, but I had to vote just on general principle. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:38, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Simultaneously Keep and Delete, as quantum theory is confusing. -- 575  Rev  olve  08:52, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, as it is impossible to ascertain whether it meets WP:BLP. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:58, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Reply hazy, try again. Quantum 8-Ball 13:50, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Fuzziness If I leave this page and take the article off my watchlist, is the article in a state of both being deleted and kept at the same time; that is, until I check to see if it's still there ? -- Racer X11 Talk to me Stalk me  15:56, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep --Alice
 * Delete --Bob
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.