Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Schultz & Forever


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was already speedily deleted by User:Tokyogirl79. Metropolitan90 (talk) 15:53, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Schultz & Forever

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:TOOSOON for this young artist. Does not pass the notability criteria for musicians. The record label also does not appear to be a major one, which was the potential criteria that could have helped pass notability. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 14:05, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:09, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:09, 15 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - No evidence of notability. Fails WP:MUSICBIO. - MrX 17:18, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar   &middot;   &middot;  18:38, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar   &middot;   &middot;  21:48, 29 June 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.